Informing humanitarians worldwide 24/7 — a service provided by UN OCHA

World + 15 more

Flexible donors power WFP with US$180 million to address crises, build resilience

ROME – At a time of unprecedented demands on the humanitarian system, a group of government partners are stepping up to ensure that the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) has flexible funding to meet acute humanitarian needs in sudden onset emergencies and neglected or protracted crises.

Thanks to these donors, WFP recently allocated US$180 million to some sixty country operations – while providing a vital and urgent boost to lifesaving efforts in Syria, Yemen, the Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo. These funds will also surge support to development projects and provide food assistance to refugees and displaced people.

“Flexible funds give us the freedom we need to respond more quickly, save on costs, plan for the longer term and prevent disruptions to our life-saving work,” said WFP Executive Director David Beasley. “To make the most of precious donor resources, we call on more of our government partners to provide funding that is unearmarked, predictable, and usable over multiple years.”

With the backing of donor governments and other partners, WFP is responding to an unparalleled six large-scale hunger emergencies at the same time. Whether beating back famine in South Sudan or saving lives of the Rohingya in the world’s fastest growing refugee crisis in Bangladesh, WFP is a vital component of the international response to pull people back from the brink of starvation.

Flexible funding allows WFP to act swiftly, effectively and efficiently, yet governments that provide this kind of funding are still very much in the minority as many specify how and where the money can be spent.

In 2017, Sweden, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Norway and Germany led the way in providing multilateral funding to WFP. However, these kinds of contributions to WFP last year sat at just seven percent of the total resources provided to WFP, well below a high-water mark of 20 percent of flexible funding in 2002.

The most recent allocations were made with contributions from Canada, China, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Contributions from private sector partners were also part of this allocation.

Under the agreement known as the Grand Bargain (https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/system/files/grand_bargain_final_22_may_final-2_0.pdf), concluded at the World Humanitarian Summit (https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/grand-bargain-hosted-iasc) in 2016, leading donors committed to progressively reduce earmarking, with an aim of achieving a global target of 30 percent of humanitarian funding with fewer restrictions by 2020.

Top Ten Multilateral Donors and Funding Sources to WFP in 2017

  1. Sweden 70,731,620
  2. United Kingdom 51,746,442
  3. Netherlands 46,712,553
  4. Norway 33,265,744
  5. Germany 32,007,661
  6. Denmark 30,916,844
  7. Australia 28,919,330
  8. Canada 23,472,373
  9. Ireland 18,262,632
  10. Italy 12,390,445

To see a full list of flexible contributions to WFP in 2017: https://www.wfp.org/funding/year/2017